These
days, the French government is being criticized for its inconsistency in
dealing with their extreme secularism. Laïcité, as the system of secularism is,
has so far been working with hesitation and dilemma.
On
the one hand, France is very strict in limiting religious symbols and
activities in the public sphere, but on the other hand its excesses carry the
specter of terrorism and the alleged separatism in religious groups. How could
it be?
Since
1905 France began to firmly separate the state from religion (in this context
the authority of the church). Since then, laïcité was born. Through this
concept of secularism, the state ultimately does not facilitate any religious
institutions or interfere in their affairs, so that the existing religious
community must be financially independent or human resources.
France
itself is the country with the largest number of Muslims in Europe. This is
inseparable from the massive immigration of Africans and Arabs that occurred in
the late 1960s to the 1970s. Now, the impact of laïcité causes the
Muslim community to survive with the help of Islamic countries outside France.
These assistance can be in the form of funds for the mosque, the import of
imams, or sending language teachers.
From
here, filtration does not occur optimally due to the thick ear of the state.
After France suffered massive attacks by extreme Islamic groups in recent
years, the country began to open its eyes and ears. Moreover, Emmanuel Macron
has always been away from issues related to the French Muslim community, and
has focused more on economic reform.
A
few days ago, President Macron had just issued a statement to stop the import
of imams and teachers from nine Islamic countries (including Algeria,
Morocco, Tunisia, and Turkey) which he had invited to cooperate. The President
worried that the risk of separatism would emerge, because the teachers taught
language to students who came from those mentioned countries.
This
time Macron will not allow any country to “feed” separatism. On
behalf of the republic’s sovereignty, he said that presenting the law of Turkey
(or any country) above the applicable French national law was impossible.
In
addition, Macron will also gradually end the system of sending imams who
used to preach in French mosques. He said there were 300 imams sent to
the Fashion State every year by Islamic countries, and those who arrived in
2020 would be the last to arrive in that number.
Instead,
his government has asked a institution that represents Islam in France to find
a solution to train imams on French soil. He also ensured that they
could speak French and not spread radical Islamic views.
At
this point, laïcité does indeed appear to be slackening due to
significant compromises. The state, more or less, began to interfere in matters
of religion and its adherents. Even so, criticism of the government in order to
more flex its secularism is actually increasingly arriving.
Abdallah
Zekri, general delegation of the Conseil Français du Culte Musulman (CFCM), the
nationally elected institution for regulation of Muslim religious activities,
said that the policy to be taken by the government could not be ascertained
whether it was feasible or not. For him, the most obvious at present, if
stopping the import of priests without a clear solution there will be new
problems coming up.
The
government must begin to stop
looking away from the mosque if it does not want to get mercy from extremists
as they fear. “Si l’Etat veut avoir des
imams français républicains, il faut qu’il mette la main à la poche,,” said Zekri. He urged the
government to be willing to take money out of his pocket if he wanted
pro-republican moderate priests.
At
present, France has a total of 2,500-2,700 mosques and does not have enough imams.
Prayers and rituals are often led by worshipers who understand the Qur’an
better and do it voluntarily. One of the concerns is that regeneration of
priests will not run well if the import of priests is stopped. Though the need
for Muslim religious leaders in France is quite large.
To
avoid this, it seems the government really needs to slam the steering wheel to
compromise even further. Laïcité needs a little touch of concern for
religion in certain sectors. They must go down to train more priests in France
who know republican law and have moderate views. The state also needs to
facilitate and increase the number of priest training centers. And most
importantly they have to spend to, at least, provide financial support to the
mosque.
Criticism
that comes in fact does not only come from Muslim groups. Macron was constantly
attacked by the right-wing French leader, Marine Le Pen, on the issue of how to
integrate French Muslims.
In
the midst of a wave of xenophobia and Islamophobia that has swept across
Europe, France has a great duty to maintain order and sovereignty of its
country at the same time. This secularism dilemma continues to unfold, who knows
how long, until they find the right form and strategy in handling the problem
of importing religionists who are vulnerable to being infiltrated by this
extreme ideology. Of course, without changing many things in the concept of laïcité
that had been agreed upon by their founding fathers.
As
we continue to grow and improve ourselves over all the problems we face in
Indonesia, France also needs more contextual reinterpretation of the system and
law in their country. Above all, we have a common goal to fight for the values
of justice and humanity in the life of the nation and state.
Translated from the original article : https://islami.co/persoalan-impor-imam-di-prancis-dilema-sekularisme/, by : Mohammad Pandu on 21 February 2020.